From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org  Mon Oct 15 14:59:00 2018
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A7A310DDACD
 for <freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Mon, 15 Oct 2018 14:59:00 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from the.lists@mgm51.com)
Received: from oneyou.mgm51.net (oneyou.mgm51.net [IPv6:2607:f2f8:af30::100])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256
 bits))
 (Client CN "oneyou.mgm51.net", Issuer "RapidSSL RSA CA 2018" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFB287768A
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 14:58:59 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from the.lists@mgm51.com)
Received: from sentry.24cl.com (sentry.24cl.com
 [IPv6:2001:558:6017:94:c582:1d99:a986:7609])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "sentry.24cl.com",
 Issuer "Mike's Certificate Authority" (verified OK))
 by oneyou.mgm51.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42YhR54GS4zZDym
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 10:58:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [IPv6:fdcf:b715:2f4d:1:4c45:85f8:8e30:df7d] (unknown
 [IPv6:fdcf:b715:2f4d:1:4c45:85f8:8e30:df7d])
 by sentry.24cl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42YhR44WSFzP7wP
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 10:58:56 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: freebsd packages going the debian way!
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
References: <CAPu-kW-jOpCL93G6YubPaJZQOkTYa5UzrYabdg-WbcbQje8obQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <049b9e13-688c-39ba-9d77-50e630dc9b6f@kicp.uchicago.edu>
From: Mike <the.lists@mgm51.com>
Message-ID: <1845546f-470c-4a5f-7118-24cab613e4e0@mgm51.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 10:58:53 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <049b9e13-688c-39ba-9d77-50e630dc9b6f@kicp.uchicago.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 14:59:00 -0000

On 10/15/2018 10:51 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/14/18 7:58 PM, Rob Belics wrote:
>> Unless I'm missing something, packages need to fit the lowest common
>> denominator so everything to do that must be included. That's why, if you
>> don't want all the extras, use ports.
> 
> As they always say, if you are using ports, do not use pkg on the same 
> machine.


What is the reason for not using ports and pkg on the same machine?