From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr 28 03:02:38 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67BB9131
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 03:02:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.rlhc.net (mail.rlhc.net [184.71.79.51])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "mail.rlhc.net", Issuer "RapidSSL CA" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DBEF1E40
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 03:02:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.rlhc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81F6054003E;
 Sun, 27 Apr 2014 21:59:10 -0500 (CDT)
X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - goblin.rlhc.net
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at goblin.rlhc.net
Received: from mail.rlhc.net ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (goblin.rlhc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id SofRuDu8MbXJ; Sun, 27 Apr 2014 21:59:01 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from goblin.rlhc.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.rlhc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0EF7540015;
 Sun, 27 Apr 2014 21:59:01 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 21:59:01 -0500 (CDT)
From: "Richard L. Houston" <rhouston@rlhc.net>
To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
Message-ID: <24925864.2998.1398653941694.JavaMail.root@rlhc.net>
In-Reply-To: <20140428040308.dc864082.freebsd@edvax.de>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10 USB3/Vantec NexStar  HX4R
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Originating-IP: [10.1.1.65]
X-Mailer: Zimbra 7.2.7_GA_2942 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Linux)/7.2.7_GA_2942)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 03:02:38 -0000

> First, the error "Get Max Lun not supported ( USB _ERR_TIMEOUT)"
> is printed. The device does not properly return how many logical
> devices it has, and this is probably due to a timeout issue.

> What does "camcontrol devlist" report?

<HL-DT-ST DVD-RAM GSA-H22N 1.00> at scbus0 target 0 lun 0 (pass0,cd0)=20
<WDC WD2500JS-60MHB5 10.02E04> at scbus1 target 0 lun 0 (pass1,ada0)=20
<WDC WD20EARX-00PASB0 51.0AB51> at scbus2 target 0 lun 0 (pass2,ada1)=20

The two WD disks are not in the enclosure.=20

> Maybe it's worth testing if re-attaching the (connected) enclosure
> with the proper camcontrol command works. In few cases, this can
> make "abnormal" USB devices work. See "man camcontrol" for the
> correct invoking parameters.

I=E2=80=99m assuming that the lack of devices been seen negates this step??=
=20

Disclaimer