From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Dec 18 12:13:32 2000 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 18 12:13:29 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from femail10.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail10.sdc1.sfba.home.com [24.0.95.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD88837B400 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 12:13:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from cx443070b ([24.0.36.170]) by femail10.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with SMTP id <20001218180432.NQSI10815.femail10.sdc1.sfba.home.com@cx443070b>; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 10:04:32 -0800 Message-ID: <004e01c0691d$4aab4400$aa240018@cx443070b> From: "Jeremiah Gowdy" To: "User Kuzak" , References: <200012181719.eBIHJc120613@continuum.kuzak.net> Subject: Re: Network Busy (Samba/Fbsd 4) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 10:06:49 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I've encountered a problem at a location where I am using a FreeBSD/Samba > setup as a Fileserver for a small LAN ( ~5 workstations ). The hardware spec's > of the server should be more than adiquate for a small LAN and the network is > running on all 100 base. I run the same sort of setup unfortunately. We have a DOS based database program which simply cannot be discarded. Because we're stuck with it, I accepted it, killed the NT server and setup FreeBSD/Samba. I'm running Samba 2.0.7 and FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE. Our database is 300-400 megs, and it's not the only shared EXE on my Samba server. We have timekeeping and other software that all execute directly from the Samba shares. I don't really have any issues, except that the guy who wrote the DOS program decided he liked reading data one byte at a time, so the overhead absolutely kills my bandwidth. I get around 200,000 bytes per second. I increased NMBCLUSTERS, and now, at times, the connection will peak at 700,000 bytes per second. I'm using a 100BaseTX Switch. Our server is an IBM Netfinity 3500 Dual Pentium III 500 with 256megs ram and UltraWide 7200rpm SCSI. I've tuned my smb.conf file with settings shown on the Samba website and in SPEED.txt and SPEED2.txt. My suggestions to you would be: (1) Is Samba acting as your master browser ? (You want it to) (2) Is Samba's WINS server running ? (You want this too) (3) Read speed.txt and optimize your smb.conf (4) Are you using a hub or a switch ? For this kind of DOS application sharing I've found that a switch makes all the difference in the world. (5) Rather than reading the stupid message Windows gives you about Network Busy, go to /var/log and read the log.[client] file for the client you're using along with log.smb and maybe even log.nmb. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message