From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 26 12:35:57 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E68316A420; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:35:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from msrv.matik.com.br (msrv.matik.com.br [200.152.83.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F109113C48E; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:35:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from anb.matik.com.br (anb.matik.com.br [200.152.83.34]) by msrv.matik.com.br (8.14.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l9QCZvcv068515; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 10:35:57 -0200 (BRT) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) From: JoaoBR Organization: Infomatik To: pyunyh@gmail.com Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 10:35:44 -0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200710120341.l9C3fsWe058991@repoman.freebsd.org> <200710261011.42367.joao@matik.com.br> <20071026121832.GE20617@cdnetworks.co.kr> In-Reply-To: <20071026121832.GE20617@cdnetworks.co.kr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200710261035.45408.joao@matik.com.br> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.91.2, clamav-milter version 0.91.2 on msrv.matik.com.br X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, Pyun YongHyeon Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci if_vr.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:35:57 -0000 On Friday 26 October 2007 10:18:32 Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > since I upgraded to 7 this days I loss connection to a machine wi= th > > > > vr nic > > > > > > > > the only event I can find after resetting (i have no phisical > > > > access) is > > > > > > > > Oct 26 04:31:56 ap-c kernel: vr0: link state changed to DOWN > > > > > > > > may it be related? What should I do? > > > > > > I'm pretty sure it's not related with my changes. > > > > > > If you think vr(4) is culprit for the issue try overhauled vr(4). > > > I think I've fixed many unresolved vr(4) issues but it needs more > > > testing. > > > You can download the overhauled vr(4) at the following URL. > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/vr/if_vr.c > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/vr/if_vrreg.h > > > > > > Note, don't use the overhauled driver on your production system. > > > I couldn't see any issues in the driver but it may have unnoticed > > > bugs. > > > > I will arrange a test machine to see how it goes > > Ok. Let me know if you see any unusual things. Pluging/unpluging > cables shouldn't affect the operation of vr(4). I heard stock vr(4) > is vulerable to this type of link changes. In addition, you may > notice better Rx performance. > oh no, it is not that, I wanted to say when the down event already has take= n=20 place then we can re-activate the vr nic (to up) by unplugging the network= =20 cable on the switch and access the machine again Also this machine is running almost a year perfectly releng_6 and current f= or=20 over a month or so until the latest update 2 days ago btw, both files are almost twice in size, is it correct? 66987 26 Out 10:27 if_vr.c 39430 12 Out 00:41 if_vr.c.ori 20062 26 Out 10:27 if_vrreg.h 15445 23 Abr 2007 if_vrreg.h.ori v 1.126 2007/04/23 12:19:02 phk v 1.34 2007/04/23 12:19:02 phk thank's =2D-=20 Jo=E3o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br