From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 15 20:09:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B25106564A; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:09:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from to.my.trociny@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3AAD8FC19; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:09:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so797015bwz.13 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 12:09:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:cc:subject:references:x-comment-to:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=AnVzqHFjxcPvivYsZT6oJ4juPO5Uo3jYWiRizRmaxWA=; b=g8C7/6ThOiB1FZGIscQE6GY+nWgGT5LLuG7W6riQxWWODOHNQvE1SFoqC5xWmTlU3/ 9gMzQRkfbrxjebpA9ay6FulwbufJW06sZ/1dBr32fP8e2xXzUqNIaEBqVL4D80KN5W7z QWjDd5RJ+z1qiw6LF6o6+SlN9AW4C2sPAyShs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:x-comment-to:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=i/WoYghmlmXSxqL6XzaXcch+ZCapv3KtajijUg0p/zx3VIOpaMHKWCHueuKJcaOzMo j1vh6pmPObcV9ak6a7AVPzyDFm+6Q/3h8pCBpEGtBqxXDrlynjAiaMFs4qPfNjZvqOAr bVNpVlinhaT6muXwC9jsdT9gwfGESE+V+fcVs= Received: by 10.204.52.75 with SMTP id h11mr4968279bkg.67.1297800567492; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 12:09:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([95.69.174.185]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v25sm2885243bkt.6.2011.02.15.12.09.24 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 15 Feb 2011 12:09:25 -0800 (PST) From: Mikolaj Golub To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" References: <20110203193535.X80258@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20110213164530.Y13400@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> X-Comment-To: Bjoern A. Zeeb Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 22:09:22 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20110213164530.Y13400@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> (Bjoern A. Zeeb's message of "Sun, 13 Feb 2011 17:01:28 +0000 (UTC)") Message-ID: <86tyg5ys99.fsf@kopusha.home.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: FreeBSD virtualization mailing list Subject: Re: HEADS UP: tenetative plan to merge VIMAGE parts X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:09:29 -0000 On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 17:01:28 +0000 (UTC) Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: BAZ> On Thu, 3 Feb 2011, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: BAZ> Hi, >> next week I plan to extract the initial parts from perforce and merge >> them to SVN. This will include: >> >> 1) vnet socket pushdown. BAZ> As some might have noticed I committed a bit of the "noise" from that BAZ> already. It's proven kind of hard to extract the things from perforce BAZ> with an additional several months of development and changes on top, BAZ> but it'll be easier with every commit to SVN;) BAZ> I will continue to directly commit small changes to SVN while I will BAZ> post larger ones here for review/testing. If you are tracking VIMAGE BAZ> in HEAD and anything breaks for you please yell at me! BAZ> Here's the vnet socket push back patch: BAZ> http://people.freebsd.org/~bz/20110213-01-vnet-socket-pushdown.diff BAZ> I have done some but not thorough testing on the patch. Given it BAZ> should be a complete extract from p4 I have been using it for more BAZ> than half a year though;) BAZ> I plan to commit this early-mid-weekish, so if you want to test let me BAZ> know by then. I did not do much testing but the patch works for me. BAZ> If you are on stable/8 you might want to apply the combined upcoming BAZ> merge patch before the above: BAZ> http://people.freebsd.org/~bz/20110213-02-vnet-mfc01.diff Running my notebook (stable/8) with these patches. BAZ> I'd suggest we'll check an updated smbfs patch after that and get it BAZ> in (if still needed). Previously I patched smb_trantcp.c in order to prevent crashes when mounting smbfs. Now it looks likes I don't need it any more -- smb works without that patch. -- Mikolaj Golub