From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 22 9:11:23 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (freebie.xs4all.nl [213.84.32.253]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A19D37B404; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 09:11:11 -0800 (PST) Received: (from wkb@localhost) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g2MHAg558816; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 18:10:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wkb) Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 18:10:42 +0100 From: Wilko Bulte To: Sam Leffler Cc: sos@freebsd.dk, Ian Dowse , Jon Larssen , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, sos@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is ATA partially broken in -STABLE? Message-ID: <20020322181042.B58745@freebie.xs4all.nl> References: <200203221248.g2MCmib27911@freebsd.dk> <407801c1d1c0$74867760$52557f42@errno.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <407801c1d1c0$74867760$52557f42@errno.com>; from sam@errno.com on Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 08:41:44AM -0800 X-OS: FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE X-PGP: finger wilko@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 08:41:44AM -0800, Sam Leffler wrote: > Actually, two races were reintroduced--one for disks and one for cdroms. > Please see my note with a tested patch. Could it be that this problem also influences a sysinstall? I built a 4.5-STABLE 'release' and the resulting CD boots just fine from IDE CD (according to the the device probe messages) but sysinstall tells me that it does not find a CDROM drive to install from. Verified on two different Proliant models, on both 4.5R sysinstall works just fine Wilko > Sam > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Søren Schmidt" > To: "Ian Dowse" > Cc: "Jon Larssen" ; ; > > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 4:48 AM > Subject: Re: Is ATA partially broken in -STABLE? > > > > It seems Ian Dowse wrote: > > > In message <200203220933.g2M9XGT90073@freebsd.dk>, Søren Schmidt writes: > > > >Its a known problem, the old way of solving it was: > > > > > > Ok - is there a good reason for not using spl calls to block the > > > interrupt until the tsleep(), or is it just an oversight? I guess > > > maybe you are trying to avoid the delay associated with deferring > > > the interrupt, but it must open up a number of races, especially > > > if the ATA interrupt line is shared with something else. > > > > The driver used asleep to avoid the race before the MFC, one of > > those got lost in the MFC, sorry... > > > > -Søren > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ---end of quoted text--- -- | / o / /_ _ wilko@FreeBSD.org |/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte Arnhem, the Netherlands To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message