From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 19 16:00:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB8F210656D2 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:00:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from outbackdingo@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.239]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A9938FC08 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:00:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from outbackdingo@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id f6so504305rvb.43 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:00:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=lQ+koXZpPJXgI1ZBVfcFsR8RM/aKP7sx7rAxcv73DLk=; b=uoCvaYjsBx3ic8EM7mDLDciG6YhrvPobZo8mgikIZsWMYg3TTD2xgZq0NYNpBp5FVR Bc3+EmwwX3j0C/L/ptltH+wPlgNhj+mEHqQSIRDXxiQ0ZxSb+L8KaU9aL49yhYimGAi4 0xoIVuCx1p45+5WYx9FUHKuLL7gU1YgqggIv4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=REMmwv4YVICEbSBhkTZtHJ6EFkU+AprZ7SOuSkftVJ73tv6Y864vVLqWb5f/ThV3Us zRRCQbM0rrfavqOHBk/95hfC0fmsMmgHSof7EehA2xFRgichHopfF7BMYU98C5sAtuFs XqKNfQW18M3ZVvXOgoECR173eKQ8bsAw3EjS0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.136.5 with SMTP id j5mr2826862rvd.281.1235059229018; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:00:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20090219164957.G46777@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <499D67B6.60309@datapipe.com> <20090219161505.X46627@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <499D7F0B.7000307@datapipe.com> <20090219164957.G46777@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:00:28 +0700 Message-ID: <5635aa0d0902190800s7c3b5ec2qfa894618aa4cc554@mail.gmail.com> From: Outback Dingo To: Wojciech Puchar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Paul Procacci , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: NanoBSD :: smallest image size X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:00:30 -0000 even so, im not so sure alot of people with to run a full install on a firewall, for various reasons. If I was doing it, Id go with a CF card, or USB, though age of system might make that unreliable. even pfsense can run straight off cdrom, makes a decent option also. On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Wojciech Puchar < wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: > Yeah, I realize it's more powerful than necessary to handle the >> task...though my current firewall/router is a 860+ Mhz PIII w/ 128 Megs of >> ram. So, this would be a downgrade for my current firewall/router which >> allows me to repurpose the existing machine for something more >> computationally expensive. >> > > so - downgrade. FreeBSD easily runs (full, not stripped) on 32MB RAM > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >