From owner-freebsd-i386@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 15 19:42:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-i386@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-i386@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5FB116A402 for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 19:42:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A2C913C480 for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 19:42:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2007 19:42:18 -0000 Received: from nat-wh-1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (EHLO [192.168.1.12]) [129.13.72.169] by mail.gmx.net (mp058) with SMTP; 15 Apr 2007 21:42:18 +0200 X-Authenticated: #5465401 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18tGEZdQdItIBgQKKNozwqBSuKzs6dQQpQdOOoRTk dtncNDJmOl6TcO Message-ID: <46228014.40205@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 21:42:12 +0200 From: "[LoN]Kamikaze" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070314) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: remko@FreeBSD.org References: <200704150916.l3F9GtgX093544@freefall.freebsd.org> <4621EF3D.4080405@gmx.de> <46222216.4040009@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <46222216.4040009@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-i386@FreeBSD.org, bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: i386/111591: [Releng_6][i386][acpi_ibm] dev.acpi_ibm.0.events returns I/O error X-BeenThere: freebsd-i386@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: I386-specific issues for FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 19:42:20 -0000 Remko Lodder wrote: > [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: >> Remko Lodder wrote: >>> Synopsis: [Releng_6][i386][acpi_ibm] dev.acpi_ibm.0.events returns >>> I/O error >>> >>> State-Changed-From-To: open->closed >>> State-Changed-By: remko >>> State-Changed-When: Sun Apr 15 09:16:55 UTC 2007 >>> State-Changed-Why: duplicate of 111590 >>> >>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=111591 >>> >> >> What does a problem with the acpi_ibm module have to do with psm? I >> think those are two distinct problems. Other acpi features that are >> not used through the acpi_ibm module work fine. > > As you might have seen this already had been corrected. > Thanks for the headsup though, > > regards, > remko I cannot seem to find another PR about this. If it has already been corrected, I suppose these corrections didn't make it into stable, yet.