From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jul 18 2:21: 3 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4999237B98E for ; Tue, 18 Jul 2000 02:20:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id e6I9Kk410409; Tue, 18 Jul 2000 02:20:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 02:20:46 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Gabriel Ambuehl Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Overhead involved when accessing a symlink? Message-ID: <20000718022046.B13979@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <1672235865.20000718111505@buz.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: <1672235865.20000718111505@buz.ch>; from gabriel_ambuehl@buz.ch on Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 11:15:05AM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Gabriel Ambuehl [000718 02:15] wrote: > Hello, > we've got some the stuff on our website symlinked to other places in > the filesystem. Can anyone provide some rough data about the overhead > involved in accessing these files compared to accessing by their > "direct" (not symlinked) URL? Afaik after being used once, it's in the namecache which means only a couple of extra strcmp() and pointer dereferences. -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message