From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Mar  2 18:43:36 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FBA4475
 for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sun,  2 Mar 2014 18:43:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-oa0-x235.google.com (mail-oa0-x235.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::235])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5727C1BDD
 for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sun,  2 Mar 2014 18:43:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id j17so1577506oag.40
 for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 10:43:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type; bh=zI7rBnLP7yeILQZIzjaqUH0tebCnNyGY1vsPIcuQwy8=;
 b=RD/fwaq8sTqVzvOkKzjqS4eBbfCxkwqFKvboEbalJjRATJFKt6DGt8YsDrp0m+U2Ak
 i0UkG6/DpC/05Qlka3VYGmCaKOu/9wJHfVBFx4PnD7hg/N09vJZnJqBnCOQNYWft05g2
 r/rwAwNnXQqKV/8vAtRXQDrAVKISCsh7VCg7p7HTwj1fhrCV//F6uA32S5PDnJWpxV+L
 tTNAMuIew5Om7wLkaPSDINrcLwP45lTrZ4uFNqHWDd1FadtirQRJR3ULjscOcIDPXPmw
 QL2+OOK2K20mkDLxvtzazSQ6LuFFxAC4CWrxrtd67P8dfdZHPmfisNM/qnC12gESYOdl
 fn9Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.117.195 with SMTP id kg3mr23605415obb.17.1393785815741; 
 Sun, 02 Mar 2014 10:43:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.182.78.71 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 10:43:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <44fvn4pn7z.fsf@lowell-desk.lan>
References: <CA+WntOufYoHVT7kpGasMNwnTYNWvaidf4z7Pv8mhaOOJWWfAeA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140227022614.GF81440@lor.one-eyed-alien.net>
 <CA+WntOsyKfPQQ2epEekJvDVQFqGaAqvU=dD10veV2njNBpp2RA@mail.gmail.com>
 <44fvn4pn7z.fsf@lowell-desk.lan>
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 13:43:35 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+WntOuEXjt5xT7ZvGLwLiQwYxrgavApi0ZT4EFA5hU8vTVcRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: CLang flags query:: I'm wanting to port software to FreeBSD
From: Joe Nosay <superbisquit@gmail.com>
To: ports <ports@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 18:43:36 -0000

On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Lowell Gilbert <
freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org> wrote:

> Joe Nosay <superbisquit@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > jack_trauma.c:21:9: warning: 'IP_DONTFRAG' macro redefined
> > #define IP_DONTFRAG 1
> >         ^
> > /usr/include/netinet/in.h:464:
> > 9: note: previous definition is here
> > #define IP_DONTFRAG             67   /* don't fragment packet */
> >         ^
> > jack_trauma.c:192:60: error: expected expression
> >     socketfd == socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_UDPLITE);
> >                                                            ^
> > jack_trauma.c:353:1: warning: type specifier missing, defaults to 'int'
> >       [-Wimplicit-int]
> > parse_options(int argc, char** argv){
> >
> >
> > That is with what I am working.  I'm not sure as how to work around it;
> so,
> > I want to try different flags.
>
> Those errors are actual problems that you need to solve rather than work
> around. The first one, for example, is normally a socket option. If
> your program is using it for a socket option, it shouldn't be defined in
> that code, but use the definition from the system in.h instead. If the
> program *isn't* using it for a socket option, then it should be named
> something different.
>


Thanks for all of the input. The project is being reworked to fix the code.