From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 16 05:47:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 568DE106566C; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 05:47:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurin@delete.org) Received: from lithium.delete.org (lithium.delete.org [198.177.254.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 377D98FC0A; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 05:47:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lithium.delete.org (Postfix, from userid 1028) id C77DC7E84F; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 00:47:05 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 00:47:05 -0500 From: Toby Burress To: Tom Rhodes Message-ID: <20091216054705.GB3748@lithium.delete.org> References: <20091109184326.GG67127@lithium.delete.org> <20091109193952.1b8f790e.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <20091110012610.GH67127@lithium.delete.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091110012610.GH67127@lithium.delete.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ldap-auth article patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 05:47:09 -0000 Resending this, as I guess it didn't make the list. On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 08:26:10PM -0500, Toby Burress wrote: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 07:39:52PM -0500, Tom Rhodes wrote: > > Patch modified, please verify the original meaning by giving > > my version a once over. > > It looks like this was modified from my original ticket instead of > the second patch I sent. Either one is fine (they both catch the > dimins.com -> example.org stuff, and yours additionally expands > contractions). However, in your patch there are two parenthetical > statements which aren't closed. > > 107c107 > < +# binds, there's probably some standard account you use for this. > --- > > +# binds, there's probably some standard account you use for this). > 112c112 > < +# UID elsewhere in the tree; we don't want to return those. > --- > > +# UID elsewhere in the tree; we don't want to return those). > 158a159 > > Other than that it looks fine.