From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 28 06:53:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2323106566C for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 06:53:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73DED8FC13 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 06:53:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p9S6rka3007444; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 00:53:46 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id p9S6rivW007441; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 00:53:46 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 00:53:44 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" In-Reply-To: <23575.1319749979@tristatelogic.com> Message-ID: References: <23575.1319749979@tristatelogic.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 28 Oct 2011 00:53:46 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fast personal printing _without_ CUPS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 06:53:47 -0000 On Thu, 27 Oct 2011, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > In message , > Warren Block wrote: > >> ... >>> The only thing that worries me about my rather ad-hoc way of setting up >>> a "personal" printer (as describe above) is that I sort of wonder what >>> will happen if I ever try to print something when something else is >>> currently printing. >> >> There's also the issue of printing large files, which will tie up the >> command line until the printer has buffered them all... > > "Tie up the command line" ?? > > John Levine attempted to make the same point, and I'm still not really getting > it. This is why we have X! I can have all of the "command lines" that I want, > and I frequently do. I have at least 15 different xterm windows open as we > speak, so I really don't see "tying up the command line" as a real issue. A better example would be a web browser or word processor. The program stops responding to further input until the printer has received the entire print job. This bothered people enough that they came up with lpd/lpr, which is part of the base FreeBSD system and works well. It's been around long enough for problems to have been worked out.