From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Oct 14 13:35:49 1996 Return-Path: owner-ports Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA23985 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 14 Oct 1996 13:35:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA23980; Mon, 14 Oct 1996 13:35:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rosie.scsn.net (scsn.net [206.25.246.12]) by who.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.11) with ESMTP id NAA21779 ; Mon, 14 Oct 1996 13:27:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rhiannon.scsn.net (cola70.scsn.net [206.25.247.70]) by rosie.scsn.net (post.office MTA v2.0 0813 ID# 0-13529) with ESMTP id AAA114; Mon, 14 Oct 1996 16:19:30 -0400 Received: (from root@localhost) by rhiannon.scsn.net (8.7.6/8.6.12) id QAA00447; Mon, 14 Oct 1996 16:20:16 -0400 (EDT) From: "Donald J. Maddox" Message-Id: <199610142020.QAA00447@rhiannon.scsn.net> Subject: Re: Xmfract In-Reply-To: <199610140922.CAA02451@baloon.mimi.com> from Satoshi Asami at "Oct 14, 96 02:22:49 am" To: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi Asami) Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 16:20:15 -0400 (EDT) Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Reply-To: dmaddox@scsn.net X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I don't know why you didn't get the notice, but the PR was closed > because the problem was corrected (that's why we usually close PRs :). > > Satoshi > ------- > P.S. From the end of the filed PR (you can also see any PR by going > through "http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi"): > > >Audit-Trail: > State-Changed-From-To: open-closed > State-Changed-By: asami > State-Changed-When: Fri Sep 27 15:23:09 PDT 1996 > State-Changed-Why: > I believe you are talking about packages-current on freebsd.cdrom.com > (aka ftp.freebsd.org). In that case, it was my mistake, I compiled > a package with static libXm a while ago but forgot to copy it over to > the ftp site! Sorry! > >Unformatted: I got the notice, but the file in question still has the same time stamp it had before the send-pr was filed (sometime around Aug. 12, I believe), so I assume that it has *not* been fixed. Not sure how you could fix this without changing the date on the file, but I apologise in advance if I am mistaken about this... -- Donald J. Maddox (dmaddox@scsn.net)