From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Feb 14 09:09:22 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8258116A4CE
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:09:22 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org
	(CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41E3943D46
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:09:22 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 814DD51432; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 01:09:21 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 01:09:21 -0800
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: "Michael C. Shultz" <reso3w83@verizon.net>
Message-ID: <20050214090921.GA36024@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <200501271852.j0RIqQ9t010411@mp.cs.niu.edu>
	<200502131815.21142.reso3w83@verizon.net>
	<20050214023410.GA27186@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<200502140037.30061.reso3w83@verizon.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200502140037.30061.reso3w83@verizon.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
cc: Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu>
cc: portmanager-questions-@sunsite.dk
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
cc: Ean Kingston <ean@hedron.org>
Subject: Re: Updated perl - broke stuff
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:09:22 -0000


--NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 12:37:28AM -0800, Michael C. Shultz wrote:

> portupgrade -rf forces the rebuild of the port and ALL of its=20
> dependencies, and it builds them  in the wrong order, it is nothing=20
> like portmanager.
>=20
> example:
>=20
> if the following are installed:
>=20
> masterPort-0.0
> dependentPort-A-0.0
> dependentPort-B-0.0
>=20
> then
>=20
> dependency-A-0.0 is upgraded
> to dependency-A-0.1
>=20
> portupgrade -rf masterPort-0.0
>=20
> will build the following in the following order:
>=20
> masterPort-0.0
> dependentPort-A-0.1
> dependentPort-B-0.0

Maybe I misunderstand what relationship you are thinking of between
these ports, but 'portupgrade -rf dependency-A-0.0' would do
dependency-A, then masterPort, just as below.  Are you confusing -r
with -R (which upgrades ports 'in the other direction in the
dependency tree')?  If I'm misunderstanding what you mean, can you
spell it out with clearer Makefile fragments (i.e. what RUN_DEPENDS on
what)?

> portmanager -u will do the following:
>=20
> dependentPort-A-0.1
> masterPort-0.0
>=20
> There is a huge difference here!  Portupgrade
> builds the top level port before it's dependencies,
> then proceeds to build all of the dependencies wither
> they need it or not.

Kris
--NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFCEGrBWry0BWjoQKURAlHUAKCfRcZjAcGf4qFp1+9WvyL4a9PGLwCgqDvp
R0zHP+Uj4p7QIW3rPQczZyU=
=K8Ox
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh--