From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 16 20:46:38 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91FD1FE7; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 20:46:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cell.glebius.int.ru (glebius.int.ru [81.19.69.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "cell.glebius.int.ru", Issuer "cell.glebius.int.ru" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D930CB3; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 20:46:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cell.glebius.int.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.glebius.int.ru (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s9GKkZRH088208 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 17 Oct 2014 00:46:35 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.glebius.int.ru (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id s9GKkZ5Z088207; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 00:46:35 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.glebius.int.ru: glebius set sender to glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 00:46:35 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Rumen Telbizov Subject: Re: 10.1-BETA2 possible kernel memory leak in routing table Message-ID: <20141016204635.GZ73266@glebius.int.ru> References: <20141001135124.GM73266@glebius.int.ru> <542C20D7.3070606@sentex.net> <20141001171646.GQ73266@glebius.int.ru> <542C5529.9030800@FreeBSD.org> <7AB35136-89AA-48F2-8B0E-1BA3DCD4A6BA@ipfw.ru> <5440284A.2020301@sentex.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: "Alexander V. Chernikov" , brian@freebsd.org, "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" , "Alexander V. Chernikov" X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 20:46:38 -0000 On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 01:29:47PM -0700, Rumen Telbizov wrote: R> As far as I know they have not. I needed to apply them manually after svn R> up to the latest 10 stable. It would be great if they become part of R> 10.1-RELEASE. I have been running with them for 2 weeks now both my R> firewalls and everything has been rock solid. I just merged both patches to stable/10. Will do a request for merge into the release. -- Totus tuus, Glebius.