From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 29 14:31:42 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D03525D8 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 14:31:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailout14.yourhostingaccount.com (mailout14.yourhostingaccount.com [65.254.253.113]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99592C10 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 14:31:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailscan09.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.15.9] helo=mailscan09.yourhostingaccount.com) by mailout14.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtp (Exim) id 1Wf8bE-0004oX-Jz for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 10:01:32 -0400 Received: from impout01.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.55.1] helo=impout01.yourhostingaccount.com) by mailscan09.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtp (Exim) id 1Wf8bE-0008JK-8w for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 10:01:32 -0400 Received: from walauthsmtp13.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.18.13]) by impout01.yourhostingaccount.com with NO UCE id vq1Y1n0050GvC8i01q1Yes; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 10:01:32 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=Zfqfx7pA c=1 sm=1 a=MlIERbc/LeOD9IsFJ/vXKg==:17 a=EUXf4MBdpf0A:10 a=BTUk5m_ZKwEA:10 a=hq8RW5-nFdsA:10 a=oKNMHU8azEoA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=YsjP1prSAAAA:8 a=mh5cOPX7AAAA:8 a=rmQgN8h9AAAA:8 a=b7xs_dz53srhVw56Np8A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=WZ6_XqxEvWYA:10 a=7UHk1aWnwlkA:10 a=98qOcNyB16KL63Z3hZrGug==:117 X-EN-OrigOutIP: 10.1.18.13 X-EN-IMPSID: vq1Y1n0050GvC8i01q1Yes Received: from adsl-64-218-114-145.dsl.amrltx.swbell.net ([64.218.114.145]:25856 helo=localhost) by walauthsmtp13.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtpa (Exim) id 1Wf8bD-0006jV-TF for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 10:01:32 -0400 Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 09:01:23 -0500 From: Mike Sanders To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spam to list participants (from openhosting.com & softcom.com) Message-ID: <20140429140123.GA910@taco-shack.cow> References: <73354.1398734218@server1.tristatelogic.com> <535F1667.1050406@soliddataservices.com> <20140429114019.0eb3ce48@X220.alogt.com> <20140429124618.06d708ba@gumby.homeunix.com> <20140429204204.2e561935@X220.alogt.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140429204204.2e561935@X220.alogt.com> X-PGP-KEY: http://freebsd.hypermart.net/gpg-key.txt User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) X-EN-UserInfo: 86ba54ea1171c58e9a877a5108176e6f:931c98230c6409dcc37fa7e93b490c27 X-EN-AuthUser: mike@freebsd.hypermart.net Sender: Mike Sanders X-EN-OrigIP: 64.218.114.145 X-EN-OrigHost: adsl-64-218-114-145.dsl.amrltx.swbell.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 14:31:42 -0000 Erich Dollansky wrote: > It is not really important. We just have to live with it. Actually, we *don't* have to live with it... If a policy were implemented whereby (say) the first two messages of new subscribers where approved/denied by the list-owner, this problem would end. -- Mike Sanders www: http://freebsd.hypermart.net gpg: 0xD94D4C13