From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 29 15:28:17 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C887A53 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:28:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x22f.google.com (mail-wi0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F9241362 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:28:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id cc10so7621532wib.14 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 08:28:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5NOpYupujm3LbuM5TlLp7eILJntzjcnq9TMPkC/jqso=; b=ahDqpK7yYFm+moZ2iXh0zhVCoJ9zVdb1uoTpNrXGGXjiFUq5e756PejrCqDHswTPMr sV6//7VRopOTqGHAnd8vso4nRhMSBZkVHAMOApoSssvUbJaorKdnPk/u4vmHwLgl3W23 mzJ38aHqnJfV7vwh9iFGde42jEgSbO04/9pTAjtZxcd3id1x7yZ66f6CaPduK26P7bR6 0ypg9L9REWYNu2620tDZc9olssH+Mu/P8k6Bg560SzHjlUlsRRB8dUK8lhOnFPt/r6qL 3QWOYcf0UrudZV4/iBpL97jt2O5IsVL8hRIywul04Kre0MANw+xYyNoV7l9bwofLvgkW jtew== X-Received: by 10.194.92.228 with SMTP id cp4mr1156078wjb.81.1398785295420; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 08:28:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (5ec2dc13.skybroadband.com. [94.194.220.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id go20sm31571483wjc.18.2014.04.29.08.28.13 for (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 29 Apr 2014 08:28:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 16:28:10 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spam to list participants (from openhosting.com & softcom.com) Message-ID: <20140429162810.76013a19@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20140429140123.GA910@taco-shack.cow> References: <73354.1398734218@server1.tristatelogic.com> <535F1667.1050406@soliddataservices.com> <20140429114019.0eb3ce48@X220.alogt.com> <20140429124618.06d708ba@gumby.homeunix.com> <20140429204204.2e561935@X220.alogt.com> <20140429140123.GA910@taco-shack.cow> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:28:17 -0000 On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 09:01:23 -0500 Mike Sanders wrote: > Erich Dollansky wrote: > > > It is not really important. We just have to live with it. > > Actually, we *don't* have to live with it... > > If a policy were implemented whereby (say) the first > two messages of new subscribers where approved/denied > by the list-owner, this problem would end. It wouldn't, it's off-list.