From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 13 22:49:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3296106568E for ; Thu, 13 Aug 2009 22:49:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 736C98FC16 for ; Thu, 13 Aug 2009 22:49:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16003 invoked by uid 399); 13 Aug 2009 22:22:33 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO foreign.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 13 Aug 2009 22:22:33 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4A849222.3090004@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:22:26 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090729) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Noland References: <200908130820.n7D8KCgt093511@svn.freebsd.org> <1250160126.1823.11.camel@balrog.2hip.net> In-Reply-To: <1250160126.1823.11.camel@balrog.2hip.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-7@freebsd.org, Nick Hibma Subject: Re: svn commit: r196169 - stable/7/sys/pci X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 22:49:15 -0000 Robert Noland wrote: > On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 08:20 +0000, Nick Hibma wrote: >> Author: n_hibma >> Date: Thu Aug 13 08:20:12 2009 >> New Revision: 196169 >> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/196169 >> >> Log: >> Hide aperture size and stolen memory behind bootverbose. > > Why? This information can be useful and doesn't need to be buried in > the verbose boot log. Useful to developers maybe, but not to the average user. Personally I'd like to see most of what we print at boot time hidden behind bootverbose, but that's just me. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection