From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 29 15:43:20 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 275F6EE8 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:43:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-f175.google.com (mail-qc0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D609215C1 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:43:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id e16so434598qcx.20 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 08:43:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; bh=ZIZdOUMXgko78E9OMu5mc+KDMl+I1zw+pvrwJGcq/a0=; b=J2wELhaCBxpqTMSXX40zyVm6eSTwFx4bvbAkZhswN1aHvG5ohGRb4lo4Lxozm+Qn0l 5F6TejTUEHA+k4Itr4+3qliYDztvKoLlYjh/lRfTntway6guOm+SJJTg2/KNrC0IRe3d 0laaSigAFwvZ+s3kBU3DgXQmFKs7akbCZGlDOys7PRB7lSnn0u7L6MHRzmQIiAMIle4u SRxxEZO/5X/ctxf8EMEvTnW1NvRNkqt9OoyKQ6PwOKGv2N3HQIs0kMK+LjRwymTnpnp9 ZolV1SJfIR87zN3NtG6tXVGj/QpGPxY50/j0fiPvbHip335EAjy9IhQAF3dOQKVWaM+O Yq7w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmxFCG1ftC+H5K3hyd0pUpMpu/kGx1xVZG3uNaNggbqUomwU8cnaEt/Ac1HVBjfcYrmJD3j X-Received: by 10.224.54.68 with SMTP id p4mr42264828qag.47.1398782400139; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 07:40:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.4.82] (newmail.mercyhighschool.com. [173.166.148.254]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id z8sm39887282qaw.17.2014.04.29.07.39.47 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 29 Apr 2014 07:39:58 -0700 (PDT) References: <73354.1398734218@server1.tristatelogic.com> <535F1667.1050406@soliddataservices.com> <20140429114019.0eb3ce48@X220.alogt.com> <20140429124618.06d708ba@gumby.homeunix.com> <20140429204204.2e561935@X220.alogt.com> <20140429140123.GA910@taco-shack.cow> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: <20140429140123.GA910@taco-shack.cow> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <08BA00AD-BBFF-42CA-8BDE-730814E64A8B@kallab.com> X-Mailer: iPod touch Mail (11D167) From: Antoine Kallab Subject: Re: Spam to list participants (from openhosting.com & softcom.com) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 10:39:41 -0400 To: Mike Sanders Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:43:20 -0000 Sent from my iPod > On Apr 29, 2014, at 10:01 AM, Mike Sanders wr= ote: >=20 > Erich Dollansky wrote: >=20 >> It is not really important. We just have to live with it. >=20 > Actually, we *don't* have to live with it... >=20 > If a policy were implemented whereby (say) the first > two messages of new subscribers where approved/denied > by the list-owner, this problem would end. This sounds like a good idea. Also, an 'abuse report' button on the mailing l= ist page might be useful.=