From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 08:56:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 613BE16A4CF; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 08:56:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from gw.celabo.org (gw.celabo.org [208.42.49.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B404743D2F; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 08:56:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nectar@celabo.org) Received: from madman.celabo.org (madman.celabo.org [10.0.1.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "madman.celabo.org", Issuer "celabo.org CA" (verified OK)) by gw.celabo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6683D54883; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 10:56:33 -0600 (CST) Received: by madman.celabo.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1E2C06D475; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 10:56:33 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 10:56:33 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: Xin LI Message-ID: <20040128165633.GD20850@madman.celabo.org> References: <200401271933.i0RJXGRW080759@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040128025015.GP565@garage.freebsd.pl> <20040128092718.GB32487@frontfree.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040128092718.GB32487@frontfree.net> X-Url: http://www.celabo.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i-ja.1 cc: Dag-Erling Smørgrav cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: Pawel Jakub Dawidek Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/mksnap_ffs mksnap_ffs.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 16:56:35 -0000 On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 05:27:18PM +0800, Xin LI wrote: > Quick question: Will this result in a security advisory? Or it will only > a version bump in the security branch? > > Personally, I'd prefer a silent version bump. Yes, it will result in a security advisory. No (intentional :-) commit to the security branches is made without a corresponding security advisory. Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine NTT/Verio SME FreeBSD UNIX Heimdal nectar@celabo.org jvidrine@verio.net nectar@freebsd.org nectar@kth.se