From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 21 10:56:35 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1587E29 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 10:56:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.turbocat.net (mail.turbocat.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:d16:4514::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73E821630 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 10:56:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop015.home.selasky.org (cm-176.74.213.204.customer.telag.net [176.74.213.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.turbocat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E606D1FE023; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 12:56:31 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <55362D11.5080106@selasky.org> Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 12:57:21 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ticso@cicely.de CC: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org, Bernd Walter Subject: Re: Strange problems with CH340G (uchcom) References: <20150420194855.GA29418@cicely7.cicely.de> <5535E84D.2010905@selasky.org> <20150421104931.GC29418@cicely7.cicely.de> In-Reply-To: <20150421104931.GC29418@cicely7.cicely.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 10:56:35 -0000 On 04/21/15 12:49, Bernd Walter wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 08:03:57AM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: >> On 04/20/15 21:48, Bernd Walter wrote: >>> I tried to flash an ESP8266 with the onboard CH340. >>> The same board works fine when I use a CP2102 instead of the CH340. >>> Flashing requires a python tool, which sends a SLIP encoded request >>> and expects a SLIP encoded response with 115200@8n1. >>> The read function however times out receiving the response without >>> getting a single byte, even if I add a high delay between sending and >>> reading. >>> The strange thing is that I can see a valid response on a scope just >>> a few µs after the request completes, while the receiver don't even >>> see the first byte. >>> If however I physically loopback the CH340 it receives it's own request >>> just fine. >>> Two CH340 xconnected work fine too. >>> Same when I xconnect a CH340 and a CP2102. >>> Now I'm completely out of ideas, why the python tool has problems >>> to see the response data with the CH340. >>> >> >> Try using: >> >> usbdump -i usbusX -f Y -vvv -s 65536 >> >> And see if the reply is seen by the USB ... maybe it is a timing issue >> like one character at a time instead of a word. > > I can't see the reply on USB. > This is the first request: > 12:32:44.019677 usbus1.6 SUBM-BULK-EP=00000002,SPD=FULL,NFR=1,SLEN=48,IVAL=0 > frame[0] WRITE 46 bytes > 0000 C0 00 08 24 00 00 00 00 00 07 07 12 20 55 55 55 |...$........ UUU| > 0010 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 |UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU| > 0020 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 C0 -- -- |UUUUUUUUUUUUU. | > flags 0x9 > status 0xca023 > > It retries this a few times. > But all BULK reads happen before. > > In the usbdump.ch340x I'd tried something else. > I'd hit 'd' during that on a CP2102 terminal programm, which was connected to the RX-line. > And at the beginning they got read: > 12:42:51.930004 usbus1.6 DONE-BULK-EP=00000082,SPD=FULL,NFR=1,SLEN=32,IVAL=0,ERR=0 > frame[0] READ 31 bytes > 0000 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 |dddddddddddddddd| > 0010 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 0D -- |dddddddddddddd. | > But no reading after sending the request. > Hi, If you don't see the traffic on USB and there are no USB errors, then maybe one of those control messages "SUBM-CTRL-EP=00000000" are clearing the FIFO. Could you check if there is such a message just before the expected data? --HPS