From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 29 20:34:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF7F016A429 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 20:34:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from silby@silby.com) Received: from relay.pair.com (relay00.pair.com [209.68.1.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F92F43D55 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 20:34:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from silby@silby.com) Received: (qmail 18041 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2005 20:34:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 29 Jun 2005 20:34:06 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 209.68.2.70 Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 15:33:44 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Silbersack To: Daniel Collins In-Reply-To: <42C2E553.7090501@earthlink.net> Message-ID: <20050629153201.M27720@odysseus.silby.com> References: <20050629032309.E27720@odysseus.silby.com> <42C2E553.7090501@earthlink.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mbuf trash-related "memory modified after free" panic fixed. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 20:34:08 -0000 On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Daniel Collins wrote: > Mike, > > I'm still seeing these printfs. Much like Pascal, my "value" is fairly > consistent. It does seem to change based on access point... I've tested > this on three different access points-- 2 open, and 1 with WPA-PSK. When I > connect to the open access points, I get "val=102c0de". When connecting to > the WPA-PSK access point, I get "val=2cc0de". This value is consistent > across kernel rebuilds and connect sessions. > > My hardware is a Thinkpad 380XD w/ Belkin F5D7010 (ral) pc card nic. > > Let me know if I can provide more information. Actually, that is a real bug. :) Damien just committed a fix in revision 1.4 of if_ral.c. Please cvsup and see if that stops the warnings. Thanks, Mike "Silby" Silbersack