From owner-freebsd-emulation  Wed Apr 24 21:37:03 1996
Return-Path: owner-emulation
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id VAA14265
          for emulation-outgoing; Wed, 24 Apr 1996 21:37:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kithrup.com (kithrup.com [205.179.156.40])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA14260
          for <emulation@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 1996 21:37:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from sef@localhost) by kithrup.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id VAA03485; Wed, 24 Apr 1996 21:36:59 -0700
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 21:36:59 -0700
From: Sean Eric Fagan <sef@kithrup.com>
Message-Id: <199604250436.VAA03485@kithrup.com>
To: spaz@u.washington.edu
Subject: Re: Has anyone grabbed the dos patches?
Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.org
Sender: owner-emulation@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>	Mike's mail re patches implied the need for a ~current box. Is
>this true? Has the kernel mutated to the point were this would be unusable
>on a 2.1R box?

My kernel patches are relative to a kernel I checked out a couple of weeks
ago (I did a 'cvs update' once, I will probably do so again soon, to keep
current with, well, -current).

I don't believe that there is anything that would prevent them from being
used on a 2.1R system; *however*, the patches would have to be backpatched.

I also don't think that Mike's version of doscmd would have any problem on a
2.1R system, but I'm not positive.

Sean.