From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 15 21:50:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41021065676; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 21:50:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83D078FC0A; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 21:50:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iakl21 with SMTP id l21so6168701iak.13 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 13:50:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=BWWRcz+Kc66W7cNXwfHMy0GIhek/G+cxthNvX7X5F+g=; b=rhPZgMsEUlXFQ3KD7ENAkEkmSvbqwVupBDcz60MmKUAK7HfwVHuGsAE5barqs2IceG rezYeu0VWwSIyHP3mUI+WqGgRwMd2E2rPx133SwN7+TkjzA+VZqG2u8uOqDChM1HcdeR jXUMnh1gNeXuMSq17yDUS5mNB2guec456xqwA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.87.167 with SMTP id az7mr4458428igb.64.1323985817944; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 13:50:17 -0800 (PST) Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.199.18 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 13:50:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.199.18 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 13:50:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4EE1EAFE.3070408@m5p.com> <4EE2AE64.9060802@m5p.com> <4EE88343.2050302@m5p.com> <4EE933C6.4020209@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20111215024249.GA13557@icarus.home.lan> <4EE9A2A0.80607@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4EE9C79B.7080607@phoronix.com> <4EE9F546.6060503@freebsd.org> <4EEA3556.7030105@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 21:50:16 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3H_H0RfZRLtgeuGQ66WdKuNcthA Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: Kevin Oberman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Michael Larabel , FreeBSD Stable Mailing List , Current FreeBSD , Daniel Kalchev , Michael Ross , freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, "O. Hartmann" , Jeremy Chadwick Subject: Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 21:50:19 -0000 On 15 Dec 2011 21:25, "Kevin Oberman" wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Chris Rees wrote: > > On 15 December 2011 17:58, O. Hartmann wrote: > >> Since ZFS in Linux can only be achieved via FUSE (ad far as I know), it > >> is legitimate to compare ZFS and ext4. It would be much more competetive > >> to compare Linux BTRFS and FreeBSD ZFS. > >> > > > > > > Er... does ext4 guarantee data integrity? > > > > You're not comparing like with like; please do some research on the > > point of ZFS before asserting that they're fair comparisons. > > > > A fair(er) comparison could be ext4 with UFS+soft-updates. > > Wouldn't UFS+SUJ be the closest atch? Yup. Thanks. Chris