From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 21 09:03:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3669716A4CF for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 09:03:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62A2A43D1D for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 09:02:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-current@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DOXTw-0002Kk-SE for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 10:56:20 +0200 Received: from kvip88.kvi.nl ([129.125.15.152]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 10:56:20 +0200 Received: from A.S.Usov by kvip88.kvi.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 10:56:20 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org From: "Alexander S. Usov" Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 10:59:49 +0200 Organization: KVI Lines: 25 Message-ID: References: <4263A33A.3030201@centtech.com> <2304.1113826754@critter.freebsd.dk> <20050418140117.GH2298@poupinou.org> <4263C6C5.300@centtech.com> <20050421083830.726cf741.sebastian.ssmoller@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: kvip88.kvi.nl User-Agent: KNode/0.9.0 Sender: news Subject: Re: powerd(8) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 09:03:02 -0000 sebastian ssmoller wrote: >> >> But in general, it looks that a main problem with original adaptive >> algorithm is that it is possible to decrease an effective cpu >> frequency to an incredibly small values (for mine centrino it can go >> from 1.3Ghz down to 75Mhz), where even the easiest things take a lot >> of time, so it is forced to increase it. It looks that just limiting >> the minimal frequency by a something like 200-300 Mhz should make the >> original adaptive algorithm work much better. >> > > agree! estctrl decreased speed only down to 600MHz which worked > perfectly for me ... guess even 200MHz would be a bit to slow still .. It really depends. I left my notebook running for a whole night and most of the time it was fluctuating at frequencies of about 75-300 Mhz, which is more than enough for mldonkey to work. But for interactive work one would really prefer to have it higher. -- Best regards, Alexander.