From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 7 01:35:00 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCAF116A4CE; Fri, 7 Nov 2003 01:35:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F8143F75; Fri, 7 Nov 2003 01:34:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) Received: from [212.227.126.162] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1AI319-0002sF-00; Fri, 07 Nov 2003 10:34:59 +0100 Received: from [80.132.225.187] (helo=Gatekeeper.FreeBSD.org) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1AI318-0003AT-00; Fri, 07 Nov 2003 10:34:58 +0100 Received: from StefanEsser.FreeBSD.org (StefanEsser [10.0.0.1]) by Gatekeeper.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07EE35F18; Fri, 7 Nov 2003 10:34:57 +0100 (CET) Received: by StefanEsser.FreeBSD.org (Postfix, from userid 200) id C1A521EAE; Fri, 7 Nov 2003 10:34:56 +0100 (CET) From: Stefan =?iso-8859-1?Q?E=DFer?= To: Bruce Evans Message-ID: <20031107093456.GA12644@StefanEsser.FreeBSD.org> Mail-Followup-To: Stefan =?iso-8859-1?Q?E=DFer?= , Bruce Evans , John Baldwin , harti@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org References: <20031107191324.V2926@gamplex.bde.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031107191324.V2926@gamplex.bde.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: harti@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New interrupt stuff breaks ASUS 2 CPU system X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 09:35:00 -0000 X-Original-Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 10:34:56 +0100 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 09:35:00 -0000 On 2003-11-07 20:04 +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: > However, using the apic almost doubles the overheads for the a45 cases. > This seems to be due to extra interrupts. The UART and/or driver already Just another data point: Seems that the interrupt rate doubled for drm0 on my system (from 60 to 120 driving a LCD at 60Hz vertical refresh). I thought this might be a problem with shared interrupts (drm0 and xl0 shared APIC IRQ 16), but removing the (actually unused) xl driver did not make a difference ... Regards, STefan