From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 1 20:03:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 640C9106566B for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 20:03:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from masoom.shaikh@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f185.google.com (mail-pz0-f185.google.com [209.85.222.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AFBC8FC13 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 20:03:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk15 with SMTP id 15so513171pzk.3 for ; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:03:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=BWk5Z8AeIJgEsceNueK71+R4luEDPNCuTZUB7itWdyc=; b=e0CjmLcIxGdNytg2kG8WW6Yr/xCzCcVqg6XwNXZDf8NHm28d2Wpf0I849UZbEcFBgd /6dKNPhc9lgR1Y7kEz69AQFJtt9/XVoVtVNYLIvW2csQ9ajIOCPAoNl2NNxDMGAjjnXY LMk/4mDj9agyuEP2oRz2EVBF/Ln89uiEv6cmk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=RvnU7ME17XlgPkshy3azlYt3U+bPBQP+SB4jZthpP5y9ziGZbGJqXgceO6lNkjeofT XpOKkzt49AKKMdcqm2MT9YPlu3Xx7Dugug3zstWEwO6cXjMLnewUq5nJWE2gJ7uF0hYw V4At8r0vFQGLFFceiyNt88cMmoPzdv0fx44Ho= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.86.5 with SMTP id j5mr2735560wab.0.1254425533355; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 12:32:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 19:32:13 +0000 Message-ID: From: Masoom Shaikh To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: bluetooth.h, c++ include error X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 20:03:48 -0000 Hello, while going through bluetooth.h, I observed int bt_devfilter(int s, struct bt_devfilter const *new, struct bt_devfilter *old); this line appears in bluetooth.h @ line # 166, rv197571 see ? the variable named 'new' will cause trouble to c++ source files i honestly believe this is not intentional, c++ programmers will have to perform some acrobats to get past this thanks, Masoom Shaikh