From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 4 07:52:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF93716A41F for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2006 07:52:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from valerio.daelli@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.191]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DAB143D45 for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2006 07:52:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from valerio.daelli@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id m18so558127nfc for ; Tue, 04 Apr 2006 00:52:26 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hw2KY/sGyD5koOffsySyxo7TAuLW85IJHXPqvf4OyooR8lfksk/Bm78KZEuWDI8uwX0F+hHYbq/YvzsOdARZXqzi55JU6/qFRQSlKffNSixo71671W153/qkLORjhiNKPQCfSJ5VQN28OKX2VQxv5wonzTGBUylsdl/IiI53U6Y= Received: by 10.49.12.8 with SMTP id p8mr199746nfi; Tue, 04 Apr 2006 00:52:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.220.10 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Apr 2006 00:52:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <27dbfc8c0604040052s7fecdc83m398286700a86e865@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 09:52:25 +0200 From: "Valerio daelli" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <443135F4.30105@netfence.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <443135F4.30105@netfence.it> Subject: Re: Samba on amd64 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 07:52:27 -0000 > Anyone using this with LDAP backend? > Does it work for you? > > To me it's giving severe troubles: smbd will tend to hang, hog CPU to > 99% and keep some file locked, the user was modifing. > I'll need to kill -9 it, in order to let the user keep on working. > > If anyone is having or has had this problem, I'd welcome any information > or experience. > I've seen past reports on this (dating back to autumn 2005), but the > thread does not end with anything that can help. > > bye & Thanks > av. We had the same problem as you, with FreeBSD 5.4, last November. We solved migrating to i386 (which worked stable for months). Bye Valerio Daelli