From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 28 14:42:18 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 570ED106564A for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 14:42:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1766E8FC1A for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 14:42:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p9SEfsMt009955; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 08:41:54 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id p9SEfrHf009952; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 08:41:54 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 08:41:53 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Daniel Feenberg In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <15996.1319704110@tristatelogic.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 28 Oct 2011 08:41:54 -0600 (MDT) Cc: Mark Felder , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fast personal printing _without_ CUPS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 14:42:18 -0000 On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, Daniel Feenberg wrote: > On Thu, 27 Oct 2011, Mark Felder wrote: > >> You've just made me a happy, happy user. I always wondered what it would >> take to get rid of CUPS, and today I've done it. Finally my print jobs are >> instantaneous here at work instead of being a mystery. Can't wait to go >> home and do the same with my personal laser. > > Has anyone here experience with PDQ? It is a printing system that appears to > address the problems cited in this thread. > > http://pdq.sourceforge.net/ > > Quoting from the website: > > Most casual unix users regard lp and lpr as > black holes to which print jobs disappear, > and may or may not emerge. The arguments seem weak to me, and it sounds like a reinvention of lpd. It's unfortunate that many people see CUPS as the default choice.