From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu May 23 13:01:35 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA13625
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 23 May 1996 13:01:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA13619
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 23 May 1996 13:01:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id MAA08125; Thu, 23 May 1996 12:54:21 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199605231954.MAA08125@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: X11R6.1 available...  Should we use?
To: dawes@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au (David Dawes)
Date: Thu, 23 May 1996 12:54:21 -0700 (MST)
Cc: jehamby@lightside.com, hackers@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <199605230633.QAA13284@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au> from "David Dawes" at May 23, 96 04:33:09 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> >xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree98 which seems to be a subset of xfree86, 
> >with no accompanying documentation!
> 
> This is for the Japanese PC98 machines (which can run variants of FreeBSD,
> NetBSD and SVR4).  I don't personally know much about these machines,
> other than that they are Intel-based, but have quite a different bus
> architecture to AT-style machines.

We should integrate the changes for PC98 support directly so that
there is no need to have seperately maintained variants.  This
includes keyboard layout, etc., not just the obvious areas.

Any Japanese takers?  I have been unable to get a PC98 here in
the US for this type of thing.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.