From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 16 22:12:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7854016A431 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 22:12:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3337343D72 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 22:11:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Fg7lc-00054k-Ne for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 17 May 2006 00:11:48 +0200 Received: from r5k156.chello.upc.cz ([86.49.10.156]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 00:11:48 +0200 Received: from martinkov by r5k156.chello.upc.cz with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 00:11:48 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: martinko Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 00:11:34 +0200 Lines: 51 Message-ID: References: <20060515222815.GA2535@picobyte.net> <1147732701.9404.44.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: r5k156.chello.upc.cz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060511 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 In-Reply-To: <1147732701.9404.44.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> Sender: news Subject: Re: New category - ports/packages specific tools? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 22:12:02 -0000 Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Shaun Amott píše v po 15. 05. 2006 v 23:28 +0100: >> There are lots of nifty tools in ports for handling ports and packages. >> It would be nice if they were all in one, easy to find place. >> >> I think there are enough of these kind of ports to warrant a new >> category. What does everyone think about this? >> >> I'm not sure on a name yet -- "freebsd", "ports", "tools", and >> "portutils" are my initial ideas. >> >> Possible candidates for the new category: >> >> devel/portcheckout >> devel/portlint >> devel/portmk >> devel/porttools >> misc/porteasy >> misc/portell >> security/portaudit >> security/portaudit-db >> sysutils/newportsversioncheck >> sysutils/pkg-orphan >> sysutils/pkg_cutleaves >> sysutils/pkg_install >> sysutils/pkg_install-devel >> sysutils/pkg_remove >> sysutils/pkg_rmleaves >> sysutils/pkg_trackinst >> sysutils/pkg_tree >> sysutils/pkgfe >> sysutils/port-authoring-tools >> sysutils/port-maintenance-tools >> sysutils/portbrowser >> sysutils/portdowngrade >> sysutils/portmanager >> sysutils/portmaster >> sysutils/portsearch >> sysutils/portsman >> sysutils/portsnap >> sysutils/portupgrade > > 28 is way too little to warrant a category. Plus you're missing a good > name for it. > "portutils" is not bad and "port(s)-mgmt" even better. and another candidate would be sysutils/bpm. m.