From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 16:40:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3145106566B; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:40:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) Received: from esa-jnhn.mail.uoguelph.ca (esa-jnhn.mail.uoguelph.ca [131.104.91.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B3BE8FC16; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:40:03 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ap4EAD6OOk+DaFvO/2dsb2JhbABDhRCsGYFyAQEEASNWGxgCAg0ZAlkGiA+naZIIgS+KKCQZDQECAggDDgQGAwUMDwMBAgKDO4MjgRYEiEqMaJMC X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,417,1325480400"; d="scan'208";a="159505570" Received: from erie.cs.uoguelph.ca (HELO zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca) ([131.104.91.206]) by esa-jnhn-pri.mail.uoguelph.ca with ESMTP; 14 Feb 2012 11:39:51 -0500 Received: from zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43FF1B4040; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:39:51 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:39:51 -0500 (EST) From: Rick Macklem To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <511955909.1353483.1329237591261.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> In-Reply-To: <4F39D382.50209@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [172.17.91.203] X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.10_GA_2692 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Win)/6.0.10_GA_2692) Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Why won't 8.2 umount -f? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:40:04 -0000 Doug Barton wrote: > On 02/13/2012 19:13, Rick Macklem wrote: > > I just looked and at least some of the fixes were MFC'd to stable/8 > > about > > 8months ago. So, they aren't in 8.2, but will be in 8.3. > > Well 8.3 is about to enter code freeze, any way we can check to be > sure > all of the relevant fixes can be mfc'ed? > I took a look and they seem to have been MFC'd. rick > > Doug > > -- > > It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short. > > Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. > Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/