From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 20 09:33:28 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5B5C93F; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:33:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roger.pau@citrix.com) Received: from SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM (smtp.eu.citrix.com [46.33.159.39]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28C2417F3; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:33:26 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,903,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="5871147" Received: from lonpex01cl02.citrite.net ([10.30.203.102]) by LONPIPO01.EU.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 20 Jun 2013 09:33:25 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.30] (10.30.203.1) by LONPEX01CL02.citrite.net (10.30.203.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:33:24 +0100 Message-ID: <51C2CC63.9070505@citrix.com> Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 11:33:23 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=E9?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeroen van der Ham Subject: Re: FreeBSD PVHVM call for testing References: <519131D8.9010307@citrix.com> <519E54DE.5090304@citrix.com> <51B5E730.6070007@citrix.com> <51B9FF53.2020901@citrix.com> <54560214-F170-426E-BDF9-2295D8B8E982@dckd.nl> In-Reply-To: <54560214-F170-426E-BDF9-2295D8B8E982@dckd.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.30.203.1] Cc: "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" , "Justin T. Gibbs" , xen-devel , "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" , "xen-users@lists.xen.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:33:28 -0000 On 20/06/13 11:20, Jeroen van der Ham wrote: > Hi, > > I have this running for a day or so now, but I'm noticing that the load averages seem a bit off: > > $ uptime > 11:17AM up 17:14, 1 user, load averages: 0.31, 0.27, 0.21 > > This is for a clean install, with just enough installed to compile this kernel. In top I'm seeing that the machine is idling >98% of the time. But this does not correlate to the load displayed above. This is probably due to the fact that we are not properly accounting for blocked/runnable/offline time. Did you see the same when running the XENHVM kernel without my patches? Roger.