From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 18 23:37:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAA5A16A40E; Thu, 18 May 2006 23:37:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83CDA43D45; Thu, 18 May 2006 23:37:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [IPv6:::1] (may be forged)) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4INZZai095467; Thu, 18 May 2006 17:35:38 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 17:35:35 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20060518.173535.70130518.imp@bsdimp.com> To: phk@phk.freebsd.dk From: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: <40194.1147976664@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <20060518.122122.71180479.imp@bsdimp.com> <40194.1147976664@critter.freebsd.dk> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, gnn@neville-neil.com, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, julian@elischer.org, hellmuth.michaelis@t-online.de Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile.inc1 ObsoleteFiles.inc src/etc/defaults rc.conf src/etc/mtree BSD.usr.dist src/etc/rc.d Makefile isdnd pcvt syscons src/release/picobsd/build picobsd src/share/man/man4 Makefile atkbd.4 kbdmux.4 pcvt.4 splash.4 vkbd.4 ... X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 23:37:21 -0000 > In message <20060518.122122.71180479.imp@bsdimp.com>, Warner Losh writes: > > >> I've not been very impressed with what I've seen from sources using > >> this approach, but I guess having the prototypes with one line > >> comments is better than nothing. > > > >Doxygen does more than one line, and you get out of it the effort that > >you put into it as far as quality goes. > > That was sort of what I hinted at: most places I've seen don't seem > to have the follow-through to actually get more than the prototypes > out. Yes. It takes everyone pulling together to make it work. Warner