From owner-freebsd-chat  Thu Dec 20 15:10:47 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Received: from lists.blarg.net (lists.blarg.net [206.124.128.17])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C6D37B405
	for <chat@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 20 Dec 2001 15:10:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from thig.blarg.net (thig.blarg.net [206.124.128.18])
	by lists.blarg.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A0852BD5B; Thu, 20 Dec 2001 15:10:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([206.124.139.115])
	by thig.blarg.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA12074;
	Thu, 20 Dec 2001 15:10:44 -0800
Received: (from jojo@localhost)
	by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.3) id fBKNBG566533;
	Thu, 20 Dec 2001 15:11:16 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from swear@blarg.net)
To: "Brandon D. Valentine" <bandix@looksharp.net>
Cc: <chat@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: GPL nonsense: time to stop
References: <20011220030449.M21508-100000@turtle.looksharp.net>
From: swear@blarg.net (Gary W. Swearingen)
Date: 20 Dec 2001 15:11:15 -0800
In-Reply-To: <20011220030449.M21508-100000@turtle.looksharp.net>
Message-ID: <wdadwdwkq4.dwd@localhost.localdomain>
Lines: 22
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-chat.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-chat>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-chat>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

"Brandon D. Valentine" <bandix@looksharp.net> writes:

> On 19 Dec 2001, Gary W. Swearingen wrote:
> 
> >> Also known as a "wildebeest." Coincidence?
> >
> >(I though it was "wildebeast".  Thanks for the proper spelling.)
> 
> I thought it was thought.  Spelling flames are lame.  If you insist on
> writing them at least proofread your flame.  ;-)

You seem to imply that my comment (one line in a longer message) was
was a spelling flame.  It wasn't.  His was the correct spelling and
I was just thanking him for the new knowledge that he had imparted.

BTW, if spelling flames are lame, why did you flame me?

I don't consider spelling flames lame, if used judiciously, but I know
that many people feel the need to post messages complaining about them,
so I seldom use them and almost never in a separate message.  Happy?

I DO consider typo flames (like yours) lame.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message