From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 6 08:22:37 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DEF416A4B3 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 08:22:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cultdeadsheep.org (charon.cultdeadsheep.org [80.65.226.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FC9043FBF for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 08:22:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org) Received: (qmail 91079 invoked by uid 85); 6 Oct 2003 17:22:32 +0200 Received: from sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org by goofy.cultdeadsheep.org by uid 82 with qmail-scanner-1.20rc2 ( Clear:RC:1:. Processed in 0.040519 secs); 06 Oct 2003 15:22:32 -0000 Received: from lucifer.cultdeadsheep.org (192.168.0.2) by goofy.cultdeadsheep.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 6 Oct 2003 17:22:32 +0200 Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 17:22:35 +0200 From: Clement Laforet To: Adam Weinberger Message-Id: <20031006172235.2ebe6f8a.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> In-Reply-To: <20031006151450.GX47415@toxic.magnesium.net> References: <200310061255.h96CtkQo019916@freefall.freebsd.org> <20031006151450.GX47415@toxic.magnesium.net> Organization: tH3 cUlt 0f tH3 d3@d sH33p X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.1) X-Face: ._cVVRDn#-2((lnfi^P7CoD4htI$4+#G/G)!w|,}H5yK~%(3-C.JlEYbOjJGFwJkt*7N^%z jYeu[;}]}F"3}l5R'l"X0HbvT^D\Q&%deCo)MayY`);TO Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org cc: edwin@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/57167: [new port] news/inn-current: Developpement version inn. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 15:22:37 -0000 On 6 Oct 2003 11:14:50 -0400 Adam Weinberger wrote: Hi ! > Any particular reason this is inn-current and not inn-devel? Most > other development versions get -devel these days. I know it doesn't > much matter, but consistency can be reassuring I guess ::) In fact I respect INN naming convention. Like FreeBSD, inn has release/stable/current version. Since I'm hosting the snapshot. I can rename the package to inn-DEVEL-${snapshot}. If so, I've just to set BRANCH to devel ;-) (to keep consistency between ports) regards, clem