From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Oct  9 03:45:20 2011
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C40106564A;
	Sun,  9 Oct 2011 03:45:20 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from 172-17-198-245.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36])
	by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6702814E71B;
	Sun,  9 Oct 2011 03:45:19 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4E9118CF.7060304@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2011 20:45:19 -0700
From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
	rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111001 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201110031305.p93D5K3x082695@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<4E8A0449.1020303@FreeBSD.org> <4E8AF399.1060601@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4E8AF399.1060601@FreeBSD.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: undefined
OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org,
	Boris Samorodov <bsam@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/imaptools distinfo
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2011 03:45:20 -0000

On 10/04/2011 04:52, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
> On 2011.10.03. 20:51, Doug Barton wrote:
>> Confirming with the author is fine, but did you compare the old and new
>> distfiles yourself? If so, what changed?
>
> Don't take my comment personally, I just picked this particular mail to
> reply to. I have never understood why such issues have been taken so
> seriously. Imo, if the author confirms the change that should be enough.

That sounds great in theory, but how do you know that it was really the
author who answered? I don't want to go too far down the conspiracy
theory rabbit hole, but diff'ing the old and new distfiles is the way to
be sure.

> If we had audited the initial port and each new upgrade,

That should be done regardless.


Doug

-- 

	Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
			-- OK Go

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/