From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Nov 9 6:39:39 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B969937B479 for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2000 06:39:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from billy-club.village.org (billy-club.village.org [10.0.0.3]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id eA9EdSg20337; Thu, 9 Nov 2000 07:39:28 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@billy-club.village.org) Received: from billy-club.village.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by billy-club.village.org (8.11.1/8.8.3) with ESMTP id eA9EeFG19496; Thu, 9 Nov 2000 07:40:15 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200011091440.eA9EeFG19496@billy-club.village.org> To: Richard J Kuhns Subject: Re: rsh problems Cc: Tony Maher , stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 09 Nov 2000 08:37:50 EST." <14858.43182.684154.605368@moriarity.grauel.com> References: <14858.43182.684154.605368@moriarity.grauel.com> <200011090930.UAA04489@shad.au.int.en-bio.com> Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2000 07:40:15 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <14858.43182.684154.605368@moriarity.grauel.com> Richard J Kuhns writes: : I mentioned this about a week ago, but didn't get any response. : /usr/src/libexec/rshd/rshd.c was changed in -current to remove PAM support : (v1.33), but it was never MFCed. /etc/pam.conf, however, was (more or : less). v1.6.2.1 (-stable) changed "sufficient" to "required" for some : reason, and v1.8 (-current only) removed the rshd line entirely. Yes. I've been swamped. I think that I have permission from jkh to go ahead and do the MFC of the code. I have other changes to rsh that I want to commit as well, so I'll do the commit to head first than MFC only the PAM related changed. The PAM module always whined for rsh, that's not new, so the whining doesn't really concern me too much given the PAM code is going away :-) Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message