From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 5 08:50:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71BA210656B3 for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2010 08:50:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 468898FC27 for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2010 08:50:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o858o8Fq037828 for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2010 08:50:08 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o858o8Gd037827; Sun, 5 Sep 2010 08:50:08 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 08:50:08 GMT Message-Id: <201009050850.o858o8Gd037827@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Alex Samorukov Cc: Subject: Re: ports/150235: sysutils/smartmontools build system bug X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Alex Samorukov List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2010 08:50:09 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/150235; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Alex Samorukov To: Garrett Wollman Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/150235: sysutils/smartmontools build system bug Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2010 10:47:40 +0200 Once again. 1) Source tree needs to be exist to build smartmontools with cissio support. It will build w/o source tree, but cissio will be disabled by configure script. 2) Out of sync sources is not a problem of smartmontools, but user. Don`t do this and and there will be no problems. 3) Your changes will break cissio functionality - so i can`t approve it. I hope, its clear. On 09/05/2010 01:29 AM, Garrett Wollman wrote: > >> I think that PR is a false at all - why do you need to have out-of-sync >> source tree? >> > Who said anything about "need"? The build should work regardless of > what the state of /usr/src is. (In my particular case, I had done a > binary upgrade from a different source tree, and hadn't yet had the > need to update /usr/src, but it's still a bug in the port's build > system.) > > -GAWollman > > >