From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 16 20:01:12 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52006E07 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 20:01:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm3-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm3-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.212.154]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E39B71A87 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 20:01:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.139.212.153] by nm3.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Apr 2014 20:01:09 -0000 Received: from [98.139.212.225] by tm10.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Apr 2014 20:01:09 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1034.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Apr 2014 20:01:09 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 614137.47882.bm@omp1034.mail.bf1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 98613 invoked by uid 60001); 16 Apr 2014 20:01:09 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1397678469; bh=1PqvUaxEjpxfkgWwBhJw7zIFdDs1mNtlB+mtG8ucWFU=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=PCVhMJU7BYW2sj7kScLyGqNIoW297P6X2hdhk6PWTyFOX/YlmDOffHUEZQeQgSqJiyyii1Jw9R5ARWuE3QbG18UKpFpSmDa9gdVQPmACapmBja90sf+7O/wblj1j853C0+dhI2Cp0WjaOFaJCnAumOhDIiauZca42XLTBGD+eJs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=C+7T16O5QgzJEV0zJbbC3rwv8Zm/amdYl54PDS8pgULDkNPdKHrq01NlQcUsFNacSxrIANpxT3ce+8z6ghC2J0o5WpnXwlUJy4MWCWHDJrT28HLs0bT7BItHsUtkXHRFonFfyeujfMkklxFTJ13UX8yyr+QE8EsKAtl76DxR9dg=; X-YMail-OSG: oMSGkiAVM1lUPceoe8qqmxeqbNBtph9D6fj2Zp50GGAAuJL W7mgx1QEqceKwWxsoqzudOXc33xsLi12bSusCAWtiHBIIuZyV4UNFxIQ9vtv bl.8.fs96DZZ4QzaoUVEXFCjKc_9YUtm7Uj_mJZN0UdZN1Xni4GipgIAePRs 4GFPvdr0knDG.sgo2z1.uS2rJFt5ijpZ1x_X2cQ.05GKqL9RTebO31ucfZf1 IegXx05_oGy7_X2JQaGBjWk1I5V9EYkG1CkV0EQr8y7M.kuG3x6YlwquCJLQ Vw29QNEZ9GEuz2qN_juMI5UoNQiQpI0x3SW0rxF51XZtmwj2947QQ3KQdx56 _1RuxiGJve66H0XnnvVo8qQodUKRP6dHmXDv5amz3IHCN6xpPNxAfVstB32B kAO6RFryhajQKA46ya43xtBHQnqVv24zfcN8BNS9dTkkF1U.GDldAtw3CD6J B7aBLepKsEzccQpiXZnv5APdweAZ9EZQDeVtJAWlWuwmL8miHx0DmDjhI9oT WFuz.klu9xxyEEAM.FL0yW8n8BifrjO80bkHAHroWHyGJF7E_8L2sAXewXA3 cLFoPPbmd9riqeU.1Lt0RHrzF4XLB20LmyXxl7J9bCdZK7vosG3q1GqtbWG_ Ct4MpJXrIDHpoh.fihr_Fa8FszHS7uXGPRWx80XQbwFjwqkV4QCYS.cun2K0 Vdo6JlgrwLZ2a1g-- Received: from [66.92.43.99] by web140901.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 13:01:09 PDT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001, VGhpcmQgYXR0ZW1wdCB0byBzZW5kIHRvIHRoZSBsaXN0ICggYSBmb3J3YXJkaW5nIG9mIGEgc2F2ZWQgU0VOVCBtZXNzYWdlLikNCkhvd2V2ZXIgYW5vdGhlciBxdWVzdGlvbg0KSW4gdGhlIG1ha2UuY29uZiB0aGVyZSBpcyBXSVRIX05FV19YT1JHDQpidXQgSSd2ZSBub3QgdGhlIHZ0KDkpIGRyaXZlci4NCg0KVVBEQVRJTkcgaXMgbm90IGNsZWFyICh0b2RheSA0IDE2KSBlbm91Z2ggYXMgdG8gd2hldGVyIFdJVEhfTkVXX1hPUkcgDQpzaG91bGQgcmVtYWluLCBvciBiZSByZXBsYWNlZCB3aXRoIFdJVEhPVVQBMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/528 YahooMailWebService/0.8.185.657 Message-ID: <1397678469.71654.YahooMailBasic@web140901.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 13:01:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Jeffrey Bouquet Subject: Fw: Re: FreeBSD ports which are currently scheduled for deletion To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 20:01:12 -0000 Third attempt to send to the list ( a forwarding of a saved SENT message.) However another question In the make.conf there is WITH_NEW_XORG but I've not the vt(9) driver. UPDATING is not clear (today 4 16) enough as to wheter WITH_NEW_XORG=20 should remain, or be replaced with WITHOUT before updating DRI since I've n= ot a 9-STABLE rebuilt since its introduction probably. Questions below remain. Apologizing for top posting, but the bottom posting does not appear at the = list yet. Glitch somewhere. Don't know if the email arriving is more important than the questions in th= e=20 email or not... --- On Tue, 4/15/14, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote: > From: Jeffrey Bouquet > Subject: Re: FreeBSD ports which are currently scheduled for deletion > To: "ports list" > Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2014, 6:16 PM > -------------------------------------------- > On Sun, 4/13/14, Jeffrey Bouquet > wrote: >=20 > Subject: Re: FreeBSD ports which are currently scheduled > for deletion > To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org > Date: Sunday, April 13, 2014, 11:45 AM > =20 > =A0=20 > =A0 On 4/13/2014 17:46, Matthew Rezny > =A0 wrote: > =20 > =A0 >>> On this list I see cfv, which I've used for > =A0 years, marked just because > =A0 >>> it's > =A0 >>> not maintained. It works great, it needs no > =A0 changes.=20 > =20 > =20 > =A0 > I'm not officially a maintainer on any ports for a > few > =A0 reasons. I have other=20 > =A0 > areas where I consider spending my time more > valuable, > =A0 but if I have to waste=20 > =A0 > it on port maintenance, I'll try to do so in the > most > =A0 efficient way.=20 > =A0=20 > =A0 Well, you basically said you're more important than > anybody > =A0 that > =A0 regularly reads this list, so good luck with that tact. > =A0 > .........................................................................= ..............I > regularly > ........................................................................= ................read > this list > ........................................................................= .................and > also > ........................................................................= ..............have > not the > ........................................................................= ...........experience > or time > =A0 So you should become a committer. > =A0=20 > =A0 Try submitting the patches, including staging and > assuming > =A0 maintainership (and then honestly be the maintainer).=A0 > =A0=20 > =A0 Staging is not an opt-in feature so as > =A0 harsh as it is to > =A0 say > =A0=20 > =A0 This indicates that you haven't been paying attention.=A0 > =A0=20 > =A0It's not a goal to have the most > =A0 ports possible;=20 > =A0=20 > ...............................................Maybe take > changes to a=20 > subsection of the forum? I've posted there... > =20 > A new subsection group: ports > X11... > WWW... > DEVEL... > maybe one DELETIONS ( a sticky or subsection) > and/or PENDING DELETIONS ... and/or > and deleted ports could be bought back again for those > who find them useful, even if someone was reading about > a years-ago removal. > =20 > Pardiff (diffp ) comes to mind (just removed this week) > I use the diffp binary for diffing ports-to-upgrade pipe > results between days (diffp portlist.MON portlist.TUE) > I suppose mergemaster.sh could even be updated to > be more similar to the output of diffp. > ..... > gfontview...=20 > ... > =20 > Just puttting that idea onto the forum expansion, which > maybe could solve problems quicker than PR's. > For instance, as of now, > textproc/po4a > x11/roxterm > devel/dconf > =20 > all fail to build "failed to load exteral entity "http://docbook.sourcef= orge.net/release/ > xsl/current/manpages/docbook.xsl"=A0 " > =20 > and maybe if the forum had been expanded, threads (dconf > po4a roxterm) would > have been started/updated explaining the fix, if anyone > knew > it.=20 > =20 >=20 > ............................................... > Lost post en route to the list [ addressee maybe > incomplete]=A0=A0=A0Re-sending from the SENT > folder.=20 > Sorry for the delay... >