From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 26 04:19:53 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8533E16A41A for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 04:19:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidb@boothscientific.com) Received: from mx2.lsn.net (mx2.lsn.net [66.90.130.74]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED3413C480 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 04:19:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidb@boothscientific.com) Received: from [172.18.0.26] (24-155-246-45.dyn.grandenetworks.net [24.155.246.45]) by mx2.lsn.net (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id l9Q4JkvL003518 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 23:19:47 -0500 From: David Booth To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 23:19:26 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <1193351234.93167.21.camel@neo.cse.buffalo.edu> In-Reply-To: <1193351234.93167.21.camel@neo.cse.buffalo.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200710252319.27118.davidb@boothscientific.com> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.2/4596/Thu Oct 25 18:37:29 2007 on mx0.lsn.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: 7.0-BETA1.5 Available... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: davidb@boothscientific.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 04:19:53 -0000 On Thursday 25 October 2007, Ken Smith wrote: > Sorry, I had a bit of a false start with 7.0-BETA1. I've got sets > of build machines used for the Monthly Snapshots and procedures in > place to try and minimize the mistakes I could make while doing > those Snapshots (previously one set for HEAD, one set for > RELENG_6). The set of machines I'll be using for the 7.0-RELEASE > build are the ones that had previously been doing the HEAD > snapshots and I missed doing one very important adjustment to the > build routine while doing the BETA1 builds, which resulted in the > builds being based on HEAD. I didn't notice during the tests I do > before uploading it because the build procedure makes most things > (e.g. uname) say what you told it to build, you need to look harder > to discover that sort of mistake. So, 7.0-BETA1 actually should > have been called something more like 8.0-SURPRISE... :-( > > Sorry for the screw-up. > This change seems to break portupgrade. It complains that it cannot parse the output of uname. I think it is not capable of handling the 1.5 after the BETA.