From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 12 14:59:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B90516A406 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:59:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Received: from mh1.centtech.com (moat3.centtech.com [64.129.166.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED5013C47E for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:59:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Received: from [10.177.171.220] ([10.177.171.220]) by mh1.centtech.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l1CExRhe094827; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 08:59:27 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <45D080D0.3050909@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 08:59:28 -0600 From: Eric Anderson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070204) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <45D07407.500@freebsd.org> <20070212143827.GA88132@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20070212143827.GA88132@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.4/2558/Mon Feb 12 06:54:21 2007 on mh1.centtech.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=8.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.6 (2006-10-03) on mh1.centtech.com Cc: Ian FREISLICH , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem building various ports (dependencies). X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:59:32 -0000 On 02/12/07 08:38, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 08:04:55AM -0600, Eric Anderson wrote: >> On 02/12/07 02:42, Ian FREISLICH wrote: >>> Eric Anderson wrote: >>>>> Is the problem with the way the ports collection detects the existence >>>>> of dependencies or with the way the dependencies are installed? >>>> I'm guessing it's the removal of objformat from the tree. You can try >>>> to grab the pre-removal version, and compile/install it. This helped me >>>> build my ports again. Painful. >>> Hmm. That would be it. Seems like it's been threatened for a long time. >>> >>> ---------------------------- >>> revision 1.19 >>> date: 2007/01/25 22:26:41; author: peter; state: dead; lines: +1 -1 >>> Retire objformat(1) as threatened in 2002. >>> >>> Ian >> >> Yep. I'm no ports guru, but seems like prior to whacking this, a quick >> burn through the ports should have been done. Not sure if it's >> happening now or not, but I just put objformat back to move on.. > > See the email I sent to ports the other week. Also make sure your > ports tree is up-to-date, yours looks like it's not. Well, I hit the problem before your email went out (a cc: to -current would have been good too, btw - unless I just missed it), and my ports are currently just 4 days old. Updating again now. Thanks for working hard to get rid of the objformat snafus.. Eric