From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri May  2 06:10:03 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1327C2C0
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 May 2014 06:10:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9FE21CFB
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 May 2014 06:10:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-108-40.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.108.40])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC9833CEE0;
 Fri,  2 May 2014 08:10:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s426A0M9002257;
 Fri, 2 May 2014 08:10:00 +0200 (CEST)
 (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de)
Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 08:10:00 +0200
From: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
To: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>
Subject: Re: enough already ..
Message-Id: <20140502081000.0105abd9.freebsd@edvax.de>
In-Reply-To: <20140502090001.56f95c69@X220.alogt.com>
References: <20140501192602.W11699@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
 <CAC2zJ1tt5n2rppmcasuGNnsd8zEYzg=YvwJpqT6OBeZxRFRqDQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140501212624.22bb00a2.freebsd@edvax.de>
 <20140502090001.56f95c69@X220.alogt.com>
Organization: EDVAX
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 06:10:03 -0000

On Fri, 2 May 2014 09:00:01 +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, 1 May 2014 21:26:24 +0200
> Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> wrote:
> [...]
> > understand the situation correctly. The target addresses have
> > been harvested from "outside the list", probably a "web copy"
> 
> No, it must be from the list itself. I even have the impression that
> the sending is triggered manually as only a very low percentage of
> mails result in spam. The moment a thread is selected, I get for every
> response to this threat a single spam-mail.

With "outside the list" I meant that the spammer doesn't seem
to have "entire access" such as a list server operator would
have. What's strange is that some messages cause an immediate
spam "reply", others don't. And if a "reply" is done, it happens
quite quickly, so it's possible that the harvester is subscribed
to the list (to receive messages), or he quickly scrapes new
entries to the "web copy" of the list (the one of FreeBSD, or
a mirror maintained by a 3rd party). This is what I meant by
"outside of the list", in combination with the fact that the
spammer does not send the messages _to_ the list. I haven't
examined the topic very accurately so this is just a guess.
Pressing DEL every few days is still sufficient here. ;-)


-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...