From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 17 09:56:07 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9493B9D0; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 09:56:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2968514EA; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 09:56:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by home.opsec.eu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s3H9tiCb063188; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 11:55:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: (from pi@localhost) by home.opsec.eu (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id s3E8TuS4016014; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 10:29:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) X-Authentication-Warning: home.opsec.eu: pi set sender to lists@opsec.eu using -f Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 10:29:56 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Benjamin Podszun Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: security/sshguard-pf Message-ID: <20140414082956.GB2341@home.opsec.eu> References: <53453547.2070307@uni-bielefeld.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: crees@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 09:56:07 -0000 Hi! > Looking at the rc script and the diff [1] the problem's easy enough: > ${sshguard_pidfile} is passed as parameter to -i, but isn't set in the > script/has no default value. Either the related line from the previous > revision should be revived or the substitution should change to use > ${pidfile}, which _is_ set. > > What now? To PR or not? PR is always a good idea. If combined with a patch that fixes the problem, more so. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 6 years to go !