From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Apr 4 10:14:58 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from sax.sax.de (sax.sax.de [193.175.26.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F245F37B67A for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 10:14:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mw@theatre.sax.de) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by sax.sax.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id TAA22062; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 19:14:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from mw@localhost) by theatre.lan (8.9.3/8.9.3) id HAA14494; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 07:22:12 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mw) Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 07:22:12 +0200 From: Martin Welk To: John Telford Cc: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Macintosh access to FreeBSD over TCP/IP ?? Message-ID: <20000404072212.A13569@theatre.lan> References: <38E961FB.E0B6929D@sympatico.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <38E961FB.E0B6929D@sympatico.ca>; from j.telford@sympatico.ca on Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 11:31:07PM -0400 Organization: Private UUCP/Usenet site. X-Operating-System: FreeBSD http://www.freebsd.org/ Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 11:31:07PM -0400, John Telford wrote: > Be gentle, I'm very new to the FBSD environment. > Is there a way that TCP/IP based Mac users can access a FBSD box on > their local Lan from their Apple Chooser ? > I'd like it to appear as just another file server to them, but I don't > want to have to put any appletalk ports/protocol on the FreeBSD box. I' > d like to keep it pure IP. You can use at least netatalk, it is a file and print server for Unix in general and there's also a FreeBSD port. It can run IP-only, but your FreeBSD/netatalk box won't appear in any MacOS Chooser when there's no AppleTalk (to be more specifix, EtherTalk) support, as this part of the communication is still done with EtherTalk. You can access the machine with AppleTalk-over-IP when your Macs support it (there are updates available). But you want to appear it in the chooser, so go with EtherTalk. Under FreeBSD, this is no hassle, there's the NETATALK kernel option for supporting that protocol and there's CAP which even doesn't need that (but instead of it, Berkeley packet filters). Regards, Martin -- ,,Oh, there's a lot of opportunities, if you're knowing to take them, you know, there's a lot of opportunities, if there aren't you can make them, make or break them!'' (Tennant/Lowe) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message