From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 05:45:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B21116A421 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 05:45:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail1.fluidhosting.com (mail1.fluidhosting.com [204.14.90.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6971343D46 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 05:45:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 33463 invoked by uid 399); 27 Jul 2005 05:45:32 -0000 Received: from mail1.fluidhosting.com (66.150.201.101) by mail1.fluidhosting.com with SMTP; 27 Jul 2005 05:45:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 74133 invoked by uid 399); 27 Jul 2005 05:45:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.15.106?) (dougb@dougbarton.net@67.20.70.103) by mail1.fluidhosting.com with SMTP; 27 Jul 2005 05:45:32 -0000 Message-ID: <42E71F77.6010705@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:45:27 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050726) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scott Long References: <42E583F9.3070703@rogers.com> <200507261853.07513.peter@wemm.org> <1242.172.16.0.199.1122429678.squirrel@172.16.0.1> <200507271215.14369.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <42E6F5EA.7030801@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <42E6F5EA.7030801@samsco.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Peter Wemm , Mike Jakubik Subject: Re: dhclient sucks X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 05:45:35 -0000 Scott Long wrote: > Part of the point of going to the new codebase was to free us from being > locked into vendor sources that we couldn't easily change. It's not at all clear to me how the ISC license prevented us from easily changing anything. There may have been other compelling reasons to change code, but I would need this one explained in more detail to be convinced. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection