From owner-freebsd-multimedia  Tue Jun 10 21:21:56 1997
Return-Path: <owner-multimedia>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA28331
          for multimedia-outgoing; Tue, 10 Jun 1997 21:21:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA28326
          for <multimedia@freebsd.org>; Tue, 10 Jun 1997 21:21:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1])
	by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA00570;
	Tue, 10 Jun 1997 21:21:01 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199706110421.VAA00570@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96
To: Mr M P Searle <csubl@csv.warwick.ac.uk>
cc: multimedia@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: matrox millenium / XFree86 3.3 xbench results 8) 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 10 Jun 1997 13:31:13 BST."
             <2477.199706101231@wrasse.csv.warwick.ac.uk> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 1997 21:21:00 -0700
From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-multimedia@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


awk -f scripts/xstones.awk < results//matrox-1100.run
TOTAL   1066823 lineStones
TOTAL    434861 fillStones
TOTAL    155673 blitStones
TOTAL  57203637 arcStones
TOTAL   3278002 textStones
TOTAL    598692 complexStones
TOTAL    496071 xStones

resolution  1152x864 32bit color depth



	Amancio

>From The Desk Of Mr M P Searle :
> > {hasty} awk -f scripts/xstones.awk  < results/matrox.run
> > TOTAL   1947365 lineStones
> > TOTAL    964984 fillStones
> > TOTAL    452761 blitStones
> > TOTAL  61404537 arcStones
> > TOTAL   3285909 textStones
> > TOTAL    993398 complexStones
> > TOTAL   1139709 xStones
> >         ^^^^^^^
> > I am in love !
> > 
> > resolution  1280x1024 color depth: 8
> > 
> > Not too long ago X servers based on et4000 used to clock in around 10 to
> > 15k xstones. In such a short time to get this kind of performance 
> > is almost a miracle .
> > 
> 
> But why run it in 8bpp? (Have you got any figures for 16 or 24bpp?)
> 
> BTW, I'm fairly sure this is more than Xi claim for the Millenium, the
> fastest card under AccelX. IIRC AccelX/Millenium does 1.0-1.1 MxStones.
> They also have no numbers for higher bpps...
> 
> Thanks, Michael.
>