From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 13:12:32 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37A3B16A4BF; Tue, 2 Sep 2003 13:12:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 219524400E; Tue, 2 Sep 2003 13:12:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h82KCUi8050922; Tue, 2 Sep 2003 22:12:30 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) To: "Max Clark" From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 02 Sep 2003 13:14:58 PDT." Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 22:12:30 +0200 Message-ID: <50921.1062533550@critter.freebsd.dk> cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FW: 20TB Storage System X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 20:12:32 -0000 In message , "Max Clark" writ es: >I know adding ccd/vinum to the equation will lower my IO throughput, but the >question is... if I have an external hardware shelf with 3.5TB (16 250GB >drives w/ Raid 5 from hardware) and I put a Raid 0 stripe across 3 of these >shelves what would my expected loss of IO be? The loss will mostly be from latency, but how much is impossible to tell I think. The statistics of this, even with my trusty old Erlang table would still be too uncertain to be of any value. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.