From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Mar  2 15:06:14 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA08435
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 15:06:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from snowcrash.cymru.net (root@snowcrash.cymru.net [163.164.160.3])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA08428
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 15:05:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from alan@localhost) by snowcrash.cymru.net (8.8.5/8.7.1) id WAA23129; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 22:38:58 GMT
From: Alan Cox <alan@cymru.net>
Message-Id: <199703022238.WAA23129@snowcrash.cymru.net>
Subject: Re: ok, final sockhash changes, new diff
To: wong@rogerswave.ca
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 1997 22:38:45 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: davem@jenolan.rutgers.edu, imb@scgt.oz.au, dg@root.com,
        netdev@roxanne.nuclecu.unam.mx, hackers@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970302082114.325A-100000@wong.rogerswave.ca> from "Ken Wong" at Mar 2, 97 08:24:08 am
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Just a thought... there is a dynamic hash algorithm (by Larson 
> from university of waterloo). perhaps able to help what michael
> is suggested.

I talked to a few dynamic  "perfect has" folks a while ago. They all said
overhead of recomputation of the hash was too high. 

ALan