From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu May 23 14:26:19 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id OAA21405 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 23 May 1996 14:26:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from etinc.com (etinc.com [204.141.244.98]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA21386 for ; Thu, 23 May 1996 14:26:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dialup-usr11.etinc.com (dialup-usr11.etinc.com [204.141.95.132]) by etinc.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id RAA29233; Thu, 23 May 1996 17:31:23 -0400 Date: Thu, 23 May 1996 17:31:23 -0400 Message-Id: <199605232131.RAA29233@etinc.com> X-Sender: dennis@etinc.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 2.0.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: "Karl Denninger, MCSNet" From: dennis@etinc.com (Dennis) Subject: Re: ISDN Compression Load on CPU Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >> Karl D. writes... >> >> >Again, note - no spinning media, no PC-bus issues.... >> >> I really hate this garbage argument. Novell servers with uptimes >> over a year are commonplace...PC bus, spinning media and all. >> you only have problems with drives that are too fast, too hot and >> too overworked, which simply isnt the case with a router scenario. >> >> Dennis > >Yeah, and I have BSD boxes with uptimes in the hundreds of days too. > >I also have CISCOs under management with uptimes measured in *years*. One >in particular with an uptime of over *four* years. The *normal* reason >that these CISCOs reboot is because the power goes away (usually >intentionally and for maintenance purposes). An awful lot of the >*CORE* hardware on my backbone has never had an unsolicited reload, >and it works VERY hard. Gee, my provider uses Ciscos and they're doing "maintenance" on them like once a month. Software upgrade or not...if you bring it down, it ain't up "for years", and I cant imagine anyone still using the crap that cisco was selling 4 years ago without upgrading..... > >In general, moving parts mean lower reliability. Further, not one PC >(or component) builder in 1000 knows item #1 about thermal engineering, >which is why all those drives, power supplies, and motherboards burn up >and burn out. Fans on processors? With REAL MTBFs in the >single-digit-thousand hour ranges? Yeah, right. For someone whos rich and idealistic, yeah :-). I'll bet that if you asked 100 people if they'd deal with a crash every 8 or 9 months to save $10,000 on a box they'd go for it 98 to 2, and we know who 1 of those 2 would be..... Dennis